SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (6322)7/15/2007 9:50:43 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
can't see why florida doesn't require some type of bond , large enough to cover ten years of damages to beaches. It seems the insurance would be enough to proceed with drilling by oil companies vs letting cuba start drilling without a bond.



To: JDN who wrote (6322)7/15/2007 9:52:21 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 25737
 
"Remember, Fla's BIGGEST industry is TOURISM. And the BEACHES are a lot of the draw. jdn"

Yes, I agree with you.

It's the weight of business interests. (The balance of economic interests will be different state to state....)



To: JDN who wrote (6322)7/15/2007 11:04:00 AM
From: Oral Roberts  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
Only problem is China and Cuba will do the drilling without FL's permission and they aren't nearly as good or safe at it as we are.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News