Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : New FADG. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (2902)	8/2/2007 9:32:17 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4152

As for the nuclear issue, if a decision were made force was necessary, an invasion wouldn't be needed, only a short air campaign. A "short air campaign" would be just the ticket that Admadinejad requires to mobilize public support on his side.. Bad idea... unless the Israelis do it. They are the ones who have justifiable cause to do so, given Tehran's threats to eliminate them from the face of the planet. Hawk

To: Brumar89 who wrote (2902)	8/2/2007 10:52:38 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4152

"I'm dead set against invading. Aiding opposition parties would be ok, I suppose. As for the nuclear issue, if a decision were made force was necessary, an invasion wouldn't be needed, only a short air campaign." How about liberating instead? There is very limited support for the current regime. Iran supports terrorists in neighboring Iraq and Afghanistan. Without Iranian support how long would the terrorists be able sustain their attacks against civilization? Iranian terrorist clients include: Iranian terrorists, Afghanistanian terrorists, the terrorist supporting government of Syria, Lebanese terrorists, Hamas terrorists, PLO terrorists, many more.