SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (17687)9/19/2007 8:11:31 PM
From: robnhood  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 25575
 
That's not what I read. Increase from 25% to 33%, and this is after all up front costs have been retrieved.
I also read that the cities and towns are going deep into debt to keep up with the influx of people.
The people of Canada and Alberta own the oil, not the oil companies.
We have a duty to future generations to get top compensation for a depleting resource and not leave a filthy polluted mess.
I say again--- If the oil companies can't make money than the price of oil is still too low to justify the oil sands.



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (17687)9/20/2007 2:37:37 AM
From: mcbeanburger  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25575
 
"I'm still waiting Harper's icebreakers ... maybe once he succeeds in completely severing ties with China..."

as a canadian living abroad i am curious to what exactly is meant by this? Is harper moving away from china and moving closer to...? US presumably.