SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (18191)10/27/2007 1:11:36 PM
From: johnlw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25575
 
Well the guy probably gave it his all and is disappointed that it got watered down.
I didn't know any of them personally so it doesn't mean anything to me who it was.
It also doesn't diminish his credibility in my eyes but then I am looking at this thing through a different shade than the majority on this board.

Y'know there was uncertainty in the market with this.
I personally took 90% of my positions of the table waiting to see the result-rightly or wrongly.

If this was such a big deal to so many of you why would you hold shares when there was an event taking place you had no control over, feared, and had a better than even chance of going against you?

That's investing?

JW



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (18191)10/27/2007 4:23:22 PM
From: johnlw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25575
 
Black Cat

How about the panel member was afraid they were going to be boiled in bitumen?
That a good enough reason for anonymity?

JW