Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (17769)	2/29/2008 7:33:01 AM
From: Gersh Avery	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

Didn't they violate the United States Constitution? Didn't they attempt to impact the outcome of the election process?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (17769)	2/29/2008 7:45:11 AM
From: Gersh Avery	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

Then it's wrong to stand up for the United States Constitution?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (17769)	2/29/2008 11:46:01 AM
From: Jim S	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25737

GZ, your post scares me a bit. We are truly in a police state when normal people can't stand up for themselves by saying they feel they are in the right in the face of authority, and when the people in authority refuse to provide truthful information to citizens. "No, officer, I wasn't speeding." "Off to jail with you then!" Or, "Pardon me, officer, exactly what IS the speed limit here?" "Two miles an hour for you, punk. Get out of the car and put your hands on your head." GZ, I respect you a lot, but your "conflict avoidance" in dealing with authority is a sure and certain path to a total police state.