SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (30246)3/2/2008 5:24:52 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 220180
 
Agriculture's new 'golden age'. Food is the new oil. This is the perspective from Canada which is a deep freezer. Now picture a country stretching north-south with 200 days of sun lots of fresh water and a plethora of technologies and tradition in agribusiness...

Agriculture's new 'golden age'.
ADRIAN WYLD/THE CANADIAN PRESS


After decades when every year seemed to be a struggle for the agricultural sector, farmers have watched with amazement the past year's skyrocketing in global prices for wheat (up 287 per cent), corn (up 149 per cent), coffee, peas, lentils, soybeans, rice, canola, dairy products and other cropland commodities.

Canadian farmers are poised to reap a bountiful reward for their crops this year in what Robert Moskow, agricultural analyst at Credit Suisse SA, describes as a new "golden age" of agriculture. The hard red spring wheat in which Canadian Prairie farmers specialize is a premium variety, now commanding about $18 (U.S.) a bushel, up from a range of $3 to $6 until two years ago. Durum wheat, another Prairie mainstay, used in pasta, is also commanding record prices.

The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) global price index leapt 40 per cent in 2007. Ottawa now estimates that average Canadian farm income will jump 16 per cent this year, and gross crop receipts will eclipse the 2006 level by 40 per cent.

The main drivers of the spike in prices, similar to the sudden buoyancy in dot-com stocks in the late 1990s, are North American government policies encouraging biofuel and biodiesel production, and rising protein demand among increasingly affluent consumers in China, India and other dynamic developing world economies. At roughly 300 million people, India's middle class is equal in size to the entire U.S. population.

Compounding matters are lengthy droughts in major wheat-producing regions, notably Australia and Ukraine. As a result, average global wheat inventories have fallen to a 30-year low, and U.S. stockpiles have dropped to 1948 levels.

The U.S. and Canada have kept their export gates open. But China, Kazakhstan and other nations have imposed export controls to protect domestic inventories, further constricting the global supply.

As if to punchline the new sexy status of farm commodities, Richard Branson has unveiled a new fuel for his Virgin Atlantic jets. The experimental fuel, used last month in the first commercial jetliner flight powered by biofuel, is an 80/20 blend of regular jet fuel and coconut oil from the babassu palm of Brazil.

Apart from farmers in the North American heartland, though, there's a scarcity of folks who are pleased about the startling food-price run-up. Earlier this month, the FAO warned that soaring food prices are a "crisis" for three dozen nations, mainly in South Asia, Africa and Central America. Riots over food shortages and sharp price hikes already have hit Mexico and Senegal.

Last month, 45 U.S. food-processing groups, representing firms whose raw material costs have gone through the roof, demanded that the U.S. agriculture secretary release farmers from their contractual obligation to maintain a portion of their land for wildlife preservation. The U.S. baking industry's trade association, representing firms such as Kellogg Co., Sara Lee Corp. and Interstate Bakeries Corp., plans a march on Washington by the firms' employees later this month to press for a reduction in U.S. wheat exports.

U.S. President George W. Bush got the message. "If you look at what's happened in corn out there, you're beginning to see the food issue and the energy issue collide," Bush said at a press conference last Thursday. "The best way to deal with [renewable fuels] is to focus on research and development that will enable us to use other raw materials [than corn] to produce ethanol."

Peter Brabeck, CEO of Nestlé SA, the world's largest food company, foresees a struggle between the food and biofuel industries over arable land as fresh water supplies diminish.

"We will not find sufficient water to produce all the crops," Brabeck said while reporting his firm's financial results last week. "There will be a fierce fight for arable land."

Arable-land acreage is indeed shrinking, even factoring out its conversion to production of fuel feedstock. Several million hectares of farmland disappear each year, as growing economies convert it into residential subdivisions and industrial parks. Declining fresh-water supplies further diminish the amount of land available for farming.

Farmers, for their part, have endured rising fuel, fertilizer and equipment costs. Some farmers, anxious to increase crop yields with more efficient equipment, are finding showrooms bare of certain high-demand tractors, harvesters and other equipment, for which waiting lists have lengthened. While still coming out further ahead than in previous years, farmers' own rising costs have cut into their bonanza. And livestock producers have been hit with the same price shock as food processors, enduring steep increases in corn and other animal feed.

Most food economists are convinced that higher prices are here to stay, although probably not at the current nosebleed levels. That would be a relief to, among others, the $30 billion U.S. pizza industry, which has been hit with unprecedented hikes in flour and cheese costs. While packaged-food companies are caught in a squeeze, unable to pass along higher costs to shoppers due to recessionary trends in the U.S., some 5 per cent of China's official inflation rate of about 6 per cent is attributed to spiralling food prices.

Some of the price escalation is due to speculation, a byproduct of the global credit crisis, in which investors have sought a safe haven in agricultural commodities. Eugene Kub, a commodity market analyst at DTN agricultural consultants in Omaha, Neb., gave financial news channel CNBC a sense last week of the significant role of speculators in the current overheated market. Since the latest harvest, Kub said, "Speculators are coming in and there was a large inflow of money, particularly in January. That's just sparked this incredible rally."

Speculation, as we learned from the dot-com bust, and more recently the collapse in U.S. home prices, tends to be short-lived. Farmers in major grain-producing regions in Europe and Australasia obviously are hoping for an end to drought conditions.

Europe's venerable Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which exists to prop up farm receipts, has long encouraged farmers to take cropland out of production. Confronted with the prospect of food inflation, Brussels will likely pressure EU member nations to revisit the notorious CAP, long vilified by foreign-aid advocates as a protectionist device that denies developing world farmers access to the lucrative market of 350 million Europeans.

Corn-based ethanol already has proved itself a dubious alternative to traditional fuels – more energy is required to produce it than it expends, prodding researchers to work on corn alternatives such as switchgrass.

Even farmers, the principal beneficiaries of high food prices that will largely insulate them from recessionary trends elsewhere in the economy this year, haven't succumbed to potentially ill-founded euphoria. Sudden drought, unseasonal rainfall and insect infestations are among the disasters that routinely destroy what seemed a promising crop. They're not inclined to let market volatility go to their heads.

"It's gone up so fast," Nebraska corn and soybean farmer Brad Beckworth told the Wall Street Journal, which last month reported that a Kansas corn farmer celebrated his good fortune by splurging on his first new washing machine in 30 years. "What's to say it won't go down fast, too?"

TAKING STALK
The amount the price of various agricultural crops has risen since Jan. 1, 2006:

Wheat, +287 per cent.
Corn, +149 per cent.
Coffee, +139 per cent.
Soybeans, +129 per cent.
Rice, +60 per cent.

The amount the share price of several key agricultural firms has risen in the past year:

Mosaic Co., +319 per cent.
Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Inc., +140 per cent.
Monsanto Co., +105 per cent.
Deere & Co., +50 per cent.
Agrium Inc., +28 per cent.
Sources: Natixis Bank, France; Google Finance

SOWING SUCCESS

• The trend: An unprecedented price boom in agricultural commodities is raising production costs for everyone from cereal marketers to pizza parlours.

• Causes: Drought, speculation, and rising demand from China, India and other rapidly growing economies.

• Impact: Canadian farm receipts are soaring, but bread, milk and other staples are becoming even less affordable in the poorest developing nations.
With policies promoting biofuel and biodiesel, and exploding demand from developing world consumers, farmers are reaping a rare bounty

Mar 02, 2008 04:30 AM
David Olive
Business Columnist

It's becoming a cliché in the world's commodity trading pits: Food is the new oil.



To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (30246)3/5/2008 1:42:15 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 220180
 
There is very little that a shirtless can produce. If they were useful, they wouldn’t be without shirts in the first place. There’s no poor people who did not deserve the fate of being poor. There’s no hard working and quick learner that you can look and say: “That is an unjust fate. Being so hard working, quick learning and being poor”. Nope. Economy rewards working and knowledge. The good ones are being rewarded. Useless ones are shirtless.

Not to allow people to end up being poor there is a mechanism provided by government called education. You throw the guy inside a room at an early age and drum on him some values and some skills, betaing him occasionally also helped. Then he comes out of school at the age between 15 and 22 and he does something about himself and won’t become poor. But of course this costs a lot. It is a huge investment into the potential shirtless to get him to a stage where he can buy shirts.

Human beings reacted to that “education as a mean of getting a shirt” by thinking: It is just enough to seat inside the room, listen to the teacher and shirts are on the way. Thus you may invest and still do not get the result you want. Therefore you get schooled guys who are useless and cannot operate on a modern economy. (For simplicity we leave criminals out)

A nation populated by a huge amount fo shirtless, has only one chance to come out of that poverty: having less number of them. They are a drag. You can calibrate the number of shirtless for a given amount fo resources and the aoutn of capable people and you get a Canada or an Australia. (They limited immigrants). If you get a shirtlessland such as Brazil, you will only be able to get enough capable people who can do something useful, and make a difference, once the number of shirtless being born goes down. Only demographic window can provide that opportunity.

Let’s say in Brazil you get 7 million people who can operate, productively, in a modern economy. There are fucking 177million who cannot. Thus the only way the economy can grow is finding how it can, with only 7 million people -out of 184 million- create wealth. That’s is easy: planting food and doing mining.
How about the service economy? you may ask. How can you operate the service economy with arms legs who has less training and brains? You know that the service economy underlies the farming and mining sectors. That is easy! Computer technology enabled the service economy to be operate by a person with very little skills. Skills found in India and the Philippines by the bus load as outsourcing shows. For example: you don’t need capable people doing banking, you use ATM’s. Get rid of the need for usefull people. You can extend the bank example to the whole economy… Although Elroy won’t get the picture.

Now you can see how, although it cannot aerodinamically fly, the Brazilian bug is flying: huge amount of resources, which doesn’t need a lot of capable people and the service economy that can be operated by little brain on top of a pair of legs. Capital loves that. Capital doesn’t ask for diplomas or for pedigree. Only return. So Elroy can forget about nice neighborhood as capital attractive.

The side effect is guys in developed countries lost a huge amount of world income. Before, they could concentrate whole industries inside their borders because they had 30 million people and 7million could operate in a modern economy. Thus they got rich by taking all the raw materials, from the God Forsaken countries, carting them away to their countries producing goods and then exporting at a high valued added.
Now this is no longer possible. The value of the people who can operate in a modern economy there –in rich countries- now is low. You can operate with little skills and they lost their leverage. As a result, you can move Ford and GM to Brazil and operate from there. You can operate a mobile network by a chimp. OPEX costs down you can sell mobile services to the shirtless. Before you need brains and capabilities to operate such complex systems. Lots of expatriates brough in to help. No need anymore.

Then you have those anomalies who, not only understands the system inner workings, but also can use it to his own advantage. And on top of all that, can articulate it. My competitivity weapon?

EXPLAIN COMPLEX STUFF IN SIMPLE TERMS THAT THE IDIOTS IN THOSE COUNTRIES I WORK CAN UNDERSTAND
Therefore helping people with little to show up to produce something useful.



To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (30246)3/5/2008 1:43:32 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 220180
 
Capital seeks return irrespective of which kind of people will deal with such capital. Long time ago, there were pre-conditions to where capital was allocated. There were some pre requisites for capital allocation.

How many people speak English, level of literacy, how many PhD’s, quantity of engineers with diplomas, accountants and lawyers, quality (or usefulness) of government. Thus capital was only hogged –oh, sorry, allocated!- to countries that had within their borders people with those skills and some other pre requisites. They also talked about ‘law and order’ but this is not necessary because without law and order you can even make more money! Siemens showed for 100 years in the telecoms sector it is very good lack of law and order.

Cut for today. Capital doesn’t give a shit about the people who’ll be dealing with it. It cares only if it can provide a return. Therefore Elroy can stop thinking that capital will return to the US and things will have another cycle. This is no business as usual. This is a new set of circumstances that makes move of capital at huge scale and permanent allocated. Give up all hope!
The bloody shirtless can operate in a way that provides return to capital. Capital treated in such manner, feels comfortable and stays there. Before the capital arrived in Brazil through one door, and leave in a bag in another. Which was the right way to do it. Even my money was safely stored abroad. No longer. Not anymore.

Since I mention the law and order thing: Today, with privatization, de-regulation and liberalization, governments uselessness is no longer a problem. In Brasilia our congress has at least 500 years of jail terms when they meet. Ok in the US it surfaces only gays or pecadillos of congressmen who like nice young ladies, but we know that under the surface there’s some backroom dealings going on with serious money involved but let’s not touch that and avoid speaking in jail terms: Fine people is another thing…

That means the damage governments used to do, is, today, attenuated.
Tell the Scandinavians to top investing hard in education. It is a waste of money, ilmarinem. There’s no return on that investment anymore. You can get a bus load of less educated and put them to hammer keyboards and they produce the same amount of return to the capital. They don’t need ergometric tables, they don’t need to heat the place, they don’t need to pay the amount of taxes. Thus they can beat the Scandinavians.
Go seek the shirtless land with something saleable and cooperate. Get your capital and invest in oranges is a good idea. That capital invested in the oranges will never ever will return to Finland.



To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (30246)9/17/2008 8:36:10 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 220180
 
Brazil-Norway convergence.
--Norwegians come to do business in Brazil.
--Everything fitting nicely.
--Brazilian Congress have looked at Norway Sovereign Wealth Fund which is oil money for when the oil finishes.
--Norway has nice deep water technology..
--Norway prime minister is here, just as PBR holds a conference on Pre-salt oil
norwaypost.no
--StatoilHydro, Petrobras May Partner on Presalt Area
bloomberg.com
--Norway pledges $1 billion to Brazil Amazon Fund
Wed Sep 17, 2008
will donate $1 billion to Brazil's Amazon protection fund through 2015, Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg said on Tuesday, to help Brazil fight deforestation.

Norway, the first country to pledge money to the fund, will donate as much as $130 million next year, the Norwegian Embassy in Brasilia said.

But the money will only be handed over if Brazil shows deforestation was reduced in the previous year, Stoltenberg told reporters during a visit to Brazil.

"The Norwegian government has decided to contribute one billion U.S. dollars to the Amazon Fund," he said.

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva launched the international fund in August. It aims to raise $21 billion over 13 years to finance conservation and sustainable development in the Amazon.

"We support Brazil's government and its efforts to preserve the forest and stop deforestation," Stoltenberg said.

"The precondition is that we can look at all of the documentation showing that deforestation is being reduced."

Deforestation has been accelerating steadily in the world's largest rainforest. Recent data showed deforestation slowed in July but Environment Minister Carlos Minc said the total area razed this year may still increase this year.

Lula welcomed the donation and said it increased the pressure on Brazil to deliver. Continued...

"This increases our responsibility to do what we are already doing today, better," he said.

The Amazon Fund will support forest conservation through scientific research and sustainable development projects such as rubber tapping, forestry management and the creation of drugs from plants.



To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (30246)4/13/2011 4:51:18 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 220180
 
support for the nationalist True Finns Party has soared in recent months, partly in response to dissatisfaction with the fact that taxpayers in this most northern of the euro zone's 17 members have been asked to bail out Greece, Ireland and Portugal at the same time as welfare benefits are being cut at home.

online.wsj.com