SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HPilot who wrote (60966)4/23/2008 10:40:33 AM
From: Travis_Bickle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 542957
 
If that's fascist just call me Adolf cause I want some of that action, paying $700 a month for a policy really sucks.



To: HPilot who wrote (60966)4/23/2008 10:46:40 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542957
 
Well when they back away from a socialist health plan, they resort to a federally funded and controlled health plan provided by insurance companies. That would not be socialist, but fascist.

Hugh, you are simply using terms like "socialist" and "fascist" as rotten tomatoes. I gather you don't like the Dems. I get the point.



To: HPilot who wrote (60966)4/23/2008 10:58:29 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542957
 
That would not be socialist, but fascist.

Well, that's progress, I guess. <g>

But "fascist" is a lame epithet, too. I already fed you "statist." What's wrong with that one? It's the most apt, I think. Or you might try "collectivist" or "anti-capitalist." Perhaps "rent-seeking" or "authoritarian." They are at least in the neighborhood. "Fascist," not by quite a stretch.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News