Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (114039)	6/16/2008 7:03:53 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

I just don't want to dictate to others whether or not they should smoke, drink, gamble, have sex with the same gender, have same sex civil unions, etc... I am consistent. ---- So smokers should get up and leave if a patron at the next table is rude enough to sit down upwind and blow smoke across the non smokers table? Then to be consistent, if an HIV infected person knowingly has unprotected sex with a non-infected person it's just too bad?

To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (114039)	6/17/2008 11:20:30 AM
From: Horgad	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

Freedom is not as cut and dry as you would like to think. Just about every freedom that is protected comes at the cost of some other freedom. For example, my freedom to murder someone is squashed and rightly so by a person's freedom to live without getting murdered. So the debate remains whether or not someone's right to eat at a restaurant, drink at a bar, ride on airplane, work at any those places, etc without having to breath secondhand smoke should or should not supercede someone else's right to smoke when and where they please. There is not easy way out. Someone has to get their toes stepped on to protect someone else's freedom. Yes there are those who want to push the argument to the extremes and try to eventually ban smoking altogether, but all I am talking about is public smoking laws which in IMHO are generally good laws. The freedom to try and live a healthy SHOULD trump someone else's right to smoke anywhere that they want to. Smoking in public is a totally different animal than drinking, gambling, snorting coke, or having sex in public. You could make a much better argument if you were trying to tell me that people should be allowed to walk around nude and fornicate when and where they pleased. Allowing public smoking is nothing short of giving people the right to slowly poison those around them. By the way I am against seatbelt laws, drug laws, prostitution laws, mandatory auto insurance, and many, many other freedom restricting laws.