SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (144527)10/31/2008 10:37:49 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
Receiving all the "oxygen and nutrients from" does not equal "inside of" or "part of", or "has not left".

Do you think that Neil Armstrong had not left Earth when he said "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind"?



To: TigerPaw who wrote (144527)10/31/2008 10:38:24 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
again

Do you support allowing the killing of a child that has passed through the birth canal or has been removed from the womb through a C-section, when the cord has not yet been cut?



To: TigerPaw who wrote (144527)11/1/2008 1:43:13 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
this is close. The issue is the fetus is infringing in the rights of the mother to live. We as a society do not legally violate one persons rights for another- ever.

You cannot force another family member to give you a kidney. The govt cannot force a parent to give a blood transfusion to a child, even if it is life threatening. Thats the way our legal system is set up. the Pro Lifers fail this test.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News