Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Windsock who wrote (260328)	5/16/2009 1:49:55 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Windsock - Do we know that the new redacted version actually says Opteron? Can you identify the document on this page? intel.com

To: Windsock who wrote (260328)	5/16/2009 2:16:06 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

"McGee's quotation comes from a recently filed document" Got a link to that? The document, that is.

To: Windsock who wrote (260328)	5/16/2009 10:08:55 PM
From: pgerassi	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

Windsock: Frankly the depth of your lack of knowledge shows that you should never post here again. Magee got it flat wrong, period! AMD knows when it offered something, not Magee or some strawman Intel boosters made up. The documents referred to CPUs and Magee likely interpreted it to mean Opterons, which was an incorrect assumption given the timing. As to any new documents, where is the link? It is your claim that the document Magee allegedly saw was different than the one posted by AMD themselves. The link I saw did not link to the post (in a blog no less) stating what your allege he said. So where is the link to the document that states Opterons? Pete