SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Bema(Bgo) and Arizona Star -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Terry Swift who wrote (8091)10/27/1997 11:01:00 PM
From: Lorne Larson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10482
 
Terry:

What you say is right - but remember at this point all thats happened is that Placer has taken an option on the property. Placer can walk away after the exploration program/feasibility study. Its only risk at this point is the up-front money, being the $10 million cash, the BGO/AZS shares it buys at $10 million and the costs of the exploration program and feasiblity study at "estimated" $40 million.

In effect BGO/AZS have optioned the property for 2 years for a payment of $60 million ($50 million if you consider that they issued treasury shares for $10 million of this). Is this a good deal - I don't know, but I do know that it likely needs shareholder approval. You can't enter into an agreement to dispose of your most substantial asset with simply a directors resolution. My main concern, as previously stated, is that it effectively blocks a take-over bid.



To: Terry Swift who wrote (8091)10/27/1997 11:21:00 PM
From: Gutman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10482
 
Terry: You say that "Placer does not get its money back up front," but then go on to say that the 51-49 split comes only out of "free cash flow", i.e., AFTER operating costs and DEBT REPAYMENTS.
That is equivalent to sayiing that PDG DOES get its money back up
front!

Or have I misunderstood you?