SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MJ who wrote (68759)7/16/2009 6:21:43 PM
From: Little Joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224707
 
When a law suit if filed, there is a process called discovery. This means that both sides have the right to obtain information from each other. Among the types of discovery allowed is the right to require your opponent to produce a document that they have or that is available to them. Also, as part of the discovery process the document could be supoenaed from the custodian.

I think the reason the Army changed its position and chose to reverse their order is because they understood that it was likely that this document would have to come to light.

What I don't understand is why those who filed other law suits were unable to get the documents. The courts in those cases must have limited discovery for some reason.

lj



To: MJ who wrote (68759)7/17/2009 5:16:38 PM
From: chartseer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224707
 
Oh bummer! In America you do not have to testify against your self. At least that was the way it used to be. The anointed one can take the fifth if it hasn't been repealed. You cannot force anyone to incriminate themselves. I am still curious though about which country's passport he used to visit Pakistan in 1981.

comrade chartseer