SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69157)7/23/2009 1:27:28 PM
From: lorne  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224713
 
Obamacare for old folks: Just 'cut your life short'
Health plan provision demands 'end-of-life' counseling

July 22, 2009
By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
wnd.com

The version of President Obama's universal health care plan pending in the U.S. House would require "end-of-life" counseling for senior citizens, and the former lieutenant governor for the state of New York is warning people to "protect their parents" from the measure.

At issue is section 1233 of the legislative proposal that deals with a government requirement for an "Advance Care Planning Consultation."

Betsy McCaughey, the former New York state officer, told former president candidate Fred Thompson during an interview on his radio program the "consultation" is no more or less than an attempt to convince seniors to die.

"One of the most shocking things is page 425, where the Congress would make it mandatory absolutely that every five years people in Medicare have a required counseling session," she said. "They will tell [them] how to end their life sooner."

The proposal specifically calls for the consultation to recommend "palliative care and hospice" for seniors in their mandatory counseling sessions. Palliative care and hospice generally focus only on pain relief until death.

Reclaim your health! Read "What Your Doctor Doesn't Know About Nutritional Medicine May Be Killing You"

The measure requires "an explanation by the practitioner of the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available, including palliative care and hospice, and benefits for such services and supports that are available under this title."

Excerpt from health care plan

It also recommends a method for death: "the use of artificially administered nutrition and hydration."


Another excerpt from the Obamacare plan

Then there's a third reference that sets out reporting requirements for doctors to monitor how such end-of-life orders are followed.

Under "QUALITY REPORTING INITIATIVE," the bill says, "For purposes of reporting data on quality measures for covered professional services furnished during 2011 and any subsequent year, to the extent that measures are available, the Secretary shall include quality measures on end of life care and advanced care planning that have been adopted or endorsed by a consensus-based organization, if appropriate. Such measures shall measure both the creation of and adherence to orders for life-sustaining treatment."

A third excerpt from Obamacare

McCaughey said she was stunned.

"As a patient advocate I am so shocked at the vicious assault on elderly people and the boomer generation," she told Thompson. "I hope people listening will protect their parents from what is intended under this bill."

She cited the federal provision that such counseling sessions must be administered every five years. If there's a significant change in the person's health or status during that time, such as an ordinary move to a nursing home because of declining physical abilities, the counseling must be administered again.

The message, she said, is "to do what's in society's best interests, and cut your life short."

"Can you imagine the response of the American people (when they find out)?" Thompson asked..

McCaughey is a health policy expert who founded HospitalInfection.org to stop hospital-acquired infections as well as DefendYourHealthCare.us concerning the proposed nationalization of health care.

The law also allows preferences that treatment levels set up by patients "may range from an indication for full treatment to an indication to limit some or all … interventions."

McCaughey also said the Obama administration is suggesting that medical care be withheld from seniors based on the expected years they have left to live. Such a program already is in effect in the United Kingdom, where patients losing their eyesight to age-related macular degeneration cannot be given an eyesight-saving medication until they lose sight in one eye.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69157)7/23/2009 1:29:49 PM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224713
 
• Page 29: Admission: your health care will be rationed!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69157)7/23/2009 1:30:39 PM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224713
 
Oh Oh Kenny better fire your secratary.

• Page 126: Employers MUST pay healthcare bills for part-time employees AND their families.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69157)7/23/2009 1:31:47 PM
From: longnshort6 Recommendations  Respond to of 224713
 
bye,bye kenny

• Page 427: Government mandates program that orders end-of-life treatment; government dictates how your life ends.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69157)7/23/2009 3:04:14 PM
From: Ann Corrigan3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224713
 
Ken, the reason the doctors are forced to recommend so many tests is an attempt to protect their practices from cannibalistic liberal trial lawyers who've hit them with non-stop frivolous lawsuits for the past 25yrs, and thereby drove the cost of their insurance into the stratosphere.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69157)7/23/2009 3:35:53 PM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224713
 
3 DEM MAYORS One each REP and DEM Assemblymen Arrested

3 N.J. Mayors Arrested In Major Corruption Probe
by Dina Temple-Raston


In Focus
Two-Way Blog: Probe Began Years Ago
NPR.org, July 23, 2009 · The mayors of three New Jersey cities, two state legislators and five rabbis were among dozens of people rounded up by federal authorities Thursday morning in connection with a decade-long investigation into corruption, bribery and money laundering.

Starting at 6 a.m., more than 300 agents and local law enforcement officials fanned out to 54 different locations in New Jersey and New York to make the arrests and execute search warrants related to the probe.

The list of the 44 people arrested reads like a who's who of eastern New Jersey politics. They included Democratic Mayors Peter Cammarano of Hoboken, Dennis Elwell of Secaucus and Anthony Suarez of Ridgefield; Republican Assemblyman Daniel Van Pelt; and Democratic Assemblyman L. Harvey Smith, according to the U.S. attorney's office in New Jersey. Jersey City's Deputy Mayor Leona Beldini and City Council President Mariano Vega also were part of the sweep.

Those suspects are accused of accepting tens of thousands of dollars apiece in bribes.

The investigation began as a money laundering probe, officials said. The FBI had infiltrated a network out of New Jersey and New York that had been funneling tens of millions of dollars through charitable, nonprofit entities allegedly controlled by a handful of rabbis in Brooklyn, N.Y., and New Jersey. Officials said the money was typically laundered through contacts in Israel and then, apparently, was returned with between 10 percent to 15 percent taken off the top as a commission. The rabbis are from Brooklyn and the New Jersey cities of Deal and Elberon.

"These defendants laundered about $3 million just through our cooperating witness alone," Ralph Marra Jr., New Jersey's acting U.S. attorney, said at a news conference Thursday.

According to criminal complaints released by the U.S. attorney's office, a Brooklyn man is accused of enticing people to give up a kidney for $10,000 and then reselling the organs for transplant for $160,000 apiece. The complaints state that Levy Izhak Rosenbaum has been brokering the illegal sale of kidneys for a decade.

The investigation morphed into a public corruption probe about two years ago, officials said. That's when a witness working with the FBI pretended to be a building developer and reportedly was able to bribe New Jersey officials to get zoning changes and guarantees of smooth building inspections.

In one such incident, the FBI's cooperating witness allegedly met with Cammarano in a diner, according to the criminal complaints. The fake developer asked Cammarano, who had not yet become mayor, for some sort of assurance that his projects wouldn't get caught up in city bureaucracy and would be expedited by Hoboken's City Council in exchange for money. Cammarano replied, "I promise you," adding, "You're gonna be, you're gonna be treated like a friend," the complaints state.

The developer said he would give a middleman $5,000 in cash for Cammarano and another $5,000 after he became mayor. "OK," Cammarano replied, according to the complaints. "Beautiful."

Joseph Hayden, an attorney who is representing Cammarano, told The Associated Press that his client was "innocent of these charges. He intends to fight them with all his strength until he proves his innocence."

All those involved were expected to appear in court later Thursday in Newark, N.J. The FBI's Newark office has already started processing the defendants, officials there said.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69157)7/23/2009 3:38:17 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224713
 
WATERLOO

Reid: No health care vote in Senate until fall
Jul 23 03:01 PM US/Eastern
By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

WASHINGTON (AP) - Senate Democratic leaders on Thursday abandoned plans for a vote on health care before Congress' August recess, dealing a blow to President Barack Obama's ambitious timetable to revamp the nation's $2.4 trillion system of medical care.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., delivered the official pronouncement, saying, "It's better to have a product based on quality and thoughtfulness rather than try to jam something through."

His words were a near-echo of Republicans who have criticized what they have called a rush to act on complex legislation that affects every American.

Obama shrugged off the delay.

"That's OK, I just want people to keep on working," Obama told a town hall meeting in Cleveland. "I want it done by the end of the year. I want it done by the fall."

Reid said the Senate Finance Committee will act on its portion of the bill before lawmakers' monthlong break. Reid then will merge that bill with separate legislation passed by the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee earlier this month.

The process will be difficult since Finance, led by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., is seeking a bipartisan deal while the health committee bill was passed by Democrats on a party-line vote.

Obama had pushed for votes in the House and Senate before August to ensure that lawmakers had enough time to meld the two bills into comprehensive legislation by December—before the start of a politically charged congressional election year.

Obama has made nearly daily appeals for the overhaul in the past two weeks and has summoned more than a dozen lawmakers to the White House to make his case. At stake is a massive remaking of the system. So is Obama's credibility.

At the town hall, Obama likened his health care effort to the race to put a man on the moon 40 years ago, saying some dismissed President John F. Kennedy's effort as "foolish, even impossible" and were proven wrong.

"Reform may be coming too soon for some in Washington, but it's not soon enough for the American people," Obama said.

Reid said the decision to delay a vote was made Wednesday night in hopes of getting a final bill that can win at least 60 votes in the Senate.

He said he had listened to requests from senior Republicans working with Baucus to allow more time for a compromise to emerge.

"I don't think it's unreasonable," he said.

Some Democrats are frustrated with the pace of fulfilling Obama's goal of expanding coverage to Americans who lack it and containing rising costs.

"The Finance Committee keeps dragging their feet and dragging their feet and dragging their feet. It's time for them to fish or cut bait," Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, said in a conference call with Iowa reporters.

But at the same time, nine freshman Senate Democrats, largely from swing states, sent a letter to Baucus urging him to keep working toward a bipartisan solution.

In the House, Democratic leaders are struggling to win over rebellious moderates and conservative rank-and-file party members who are demanding changes to their version of the legislation. The dispute has forced Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., to postpone work on the bill for three straight days while he negotiates.

Waxman's committee is the last of three House panels trying to finish the $1.5 trillion, 10-year legislation that would create a government-run plan to compete with private insurance, increase taxes on the wealthy and require employers and individuals to get health insurance.

Many of the provisions of the legislation wouldn't take effect until 2013—after the next presidential election.

Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., the third-ranking House Democrat, said a Thursday morning, 90-minute meeting of the leadership was particularly contentious. He said lawmakers should abandon plans for their monthlong break if the House hasn't passed a health care bill.

"We must stay here and get this thing done," he said at a news conference. "I feel very strongly about that. ... I think it will affect our standing with the American people if we don't do this."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., didn't rule out going into August to get the bill done but said it might not be necessary.

"I'm not afraid of August. It's a month," Pelosi said. "What I am interested in is the sooner the better to pass health care for the American people."

"We will take the bill to the floor when it is ready, and when it is ready we will have the votes to pass it," Pelosi added. She stood by—but didn't repeat—a claim she made Wednesday that she has the necessary votes now.

Underscoring the deep divisions among Democrats was concern among members of the Congressional Black Caucus that Obama and the leadership were making too many concessions to the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Democrats.

Leaders of the Black Caucus said they had requested a meeting with Obama.

"We felt it was important that more than one voice be heard," said Donna Christensen, the congressional delegate for the U.S. Virgin Islands who is leading the caucus' health care efforts. "When we hear phrases like 'squeezing more savings out of the system' ... we're concerned that what may be taken out will be provisions that are critical to our communities."

The black caucus wants to make sure that any overhaul retains core provisions such as a public health insurance option that guarantees coverage for everyone.

"We don't want to see them negotiated or eroded away," said Rep. Danny Davis, D-Ill.

___



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69157)7/23/2009 3:40:44 PM
From: lorne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224713
 
After lawsuit, Obama opens a bit of info on meetings with health care executives
White House still contends it can keep visitor logs secret
By Bill Dedman
Investigative reporter
msnbc.com
updated 11:50 p.m. ET, Wed., July 22, 2009
msnbc.msn.com

Despite his campaign promise to "make White House communications public," the Obama administration again is blocking the public from seeing White House visitor logs, this time refusing to disclose meetings with health care executives. Tonight, less than an hour before his news conference on health care, he released some of the information only after a nonprofit group filed a federal lawsuit.

The nonprofit group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said it was filing suit Wednesday afternoon against the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the Secret Service, after a request for the visitor logs was denied.

Within hours after the group announced it was filing suit, the White House relented, in part, saying it would voluntarily release the names and dates of visits. That is less information than is contained in the White House visitor logs, which would also show which White House employee requested the meeting, how long the person was at the White House, and other details. Despite the voluntary release, the Obama White House is still taking the same legal position as the Bush White House, arguing that release of the information is not required. A federal judge has twice rejected those arguments.

The nonprofit group had sought logs of visits to the White House and the vice president's residence by 18 people, including the heads of the nation's largest medical, insurance and pharmaceutical companies.

"Right now the White House and Congress are debating colossal changes to the American health care system, and taxpayers have a right to know who is sitting at the table influencing decision-makers," Melanie Sloan, CREW's executive director, said in a statement. The group, widely considered to be a band of liberal activists after many battles over public records with the Bush administration, has continued to press Obama for public records.

The White House position mirrors the stand taken by the Bush administration, although twice a federal judge has ruled that White House visitor logs must be released under the Freedom of Information Act. The Obama administration says the policy is under review, but it also has continued to fight release of the records by continuing the Bush administration's efforts in a federal appellate court. The Secret Service said in its July 7 reply to CREW that the White House might make "discretionary releases," but again took the position that White House visitor logs are not covered by FOIA and also would reveal presidential communications. The Bush administration lost both arguments in federal court, and appealed.

Last month the Secret Service denied msnbc.com's request for logs of all White House visitors from Inauguration Day on Jan. 20. Msnbc.com filed an administrative appeal. A narrower request by CREW, for logs of visits by coal industry executives, also was rejected, and CREW sued on June 16.

A campaign promise
During the presidential campaign, Obama promised several times to open up records of lobbying, including a promise to "Make White House Communications Public: Obama will amend executive orders to ensure that communications about regulatory policymaking between persons outside the government and all White House staff are disclosed to the public."

White House spokesman Ben LaBolt said Wednesday that the policy on visitor logs remains under review.

Anticipating the limited release of records Wednesday evening, CREW attorney Anne L. Weismann said, "It's our view this is merely spin and not a real effort at transparency."

An hour before the president's news conference on health care, the White House sent CREW the following list of visits by health care executives:

Bill Tauzin visited the White House on March 5, May 19, June 2, and June 24. He is president and CEO, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.
Karen Ignagni visited the White House on March 5, 6, and 11 and June 30. She is president and CEO, America's Health Insurance Plans.
Richard Umbdenstock visited the White House on February 4, February 23; March 5, March 25, March 30; April 6, and May 22. He is president and CEO, American Hospital Association.
J. James Rohack visited the White House on March 25, June 22, and June 24. The cardiologist from Texas is president of the American Medical Association.
William C. Weldon visited the White House on May 12. He is chairman and CEO, Johnson & Johnson.
Jeffrey B. Kindler visited the White House on March 5, May 6, and June 2. He is chairman and CEO, Pfizer.
Stephen J. Hemsley visited the White House on May 15 and 22. He is president and CEO, UnitedHealth Group.
Angela F. Braly visited the White House on February 13. She is president and CEO, WellPoint.
George Halvorson visited the White House on March 27 and June 5. He is president and CEO, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan.
Jay Gellert visited the White House on February 10, March 11, and March 20. He is president and CEO, Health Net.
Thomas Priselac visited the White House on April 3. He is president and CEO, Cedars-Sinai Health System.
Richard Clark visited the White House on March 24. He is chairman, president and CEO, Merck.
Wayne T. Smith visited the White House on June 4. He is chairman, president and CEO, Community Health Systems.
Rick Smith visited the White House on May 19 and June 2. He is senior vice president, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.
"In addition to the above information, the White House visitor records reflect that Mr. Tauzin, Ms. Ignagni, Mr. Umbdenstock, Mr. Rohack, Mr. Kindler, Mr. Halvorson, Mr. Gellert, Mr. Priselac, David Nexon, and Rick Smith were scheduled to attend a May 11 meeting at the White House. We understand that all the individuals attended the meeting except Mr. Kindler, and that Mr. Clark attended as well."
'Transparency is not situational'
CREW responded in a statement:

"While Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington is pleased the White House has taken a step towards delivering the transparency promised in the first days of the administration, the letter sent by White House Counsel Greg Craig in no way satisfies CREW’s June 22nd Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for the Secret Service visitor records of 18 health care executives. First, the FOIA requires the administration to release the records themselves, not merely a summary of some information included in the records. The actual visitor records likely would indicate with whom each official met, the administration official who requested clearance for the visitor, the time of the meeting, the duration of the meeting and, in some cases, the purpose of the meeting. In addition, no information was provided regarding any visits to the vice president’s residence. Mr. Craig’s summary is not an adequate substitution for the records themselves.

"Second, this letter states the President has used his discretionary authority to release information regarding the visits. There is no indication, however, that this information is complete; there may well be records of other visits not included in this discretionary release. Further, as required by the FOIA, no information was provided to demonstrate the adequacy of the search.

"Finally, transparency is not situational. It is not sufficient for the White House to release certain visitor records shortly before a press conference to avoid distraction. In a separate case, CREW recently sued the administration for failing to provide records related to White House visits by coal company executives. In addition, CREW has two other cases for visitor records outstanding: one for visits by Christian conservative leaders to the Bush White House, and another for records related to visits to the Bush White House by lobbyist Stephen Payne. These cases are now before the Court of Appeals, but so far, the Obama administration has echoed the Bush administration’s position that these records are presidential, not federal, despite district court rulings clearly rejecting that legal analysis.

"Releasing some records because it is politically expedient to do so is not transparency."

Several hours before the news conference, the White House press office started telling Washington reporters that it would release the list of names and dates — without letting reporters know that it was not actually releasing the records requested by CREW. This was an apparent attempt to discourage interest in the story about CREW's lawsuit.

'I don't think there are a lot of secrets'
Nevertheless, in his news conference, the president was asked by a Chicago Tribune reporter about the blocking of visitor logs. Obama didn't answer directly about visitor logs, but pointed out that the list had been released. And he said, "On the list of health care executives who visited us, most of the time you guys have been in there taking pictures, so it hasn't been a secret."

"With respect to most of the negotiations not being on C-SPAN," the president said, "you'll recall that our kickoff event was here on C-SPAN." He said many other meetings have been with Congress, which controls its own publicity. "I don't think there are a lot of secrets going on in there."

Stepping up the pressure with this request, CREW has asked a federal court for emergency relief in the form of a preliminary injunction compelling the Secret Service to hand over its agency records.

Wednesday's lawsuit by CREW was first reported by The Los Angeles Times. "As a candidate, President Obama vowed that in devising a healthcare bill he would invite in TV cameras — specifically C-SPAN — so that Americans could have a window into negotiations that normally play out behind closed doors," the newspaper reported.

More background on the White House visitor logs, and efforts by the Bush and Obama administrations to keep them secret, is detailed in our previous story, "Obama blocks access to White House visitor logs."



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69157)7/23/2009 3:44:10 PM
From: lorne2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224713
 
Ken...Are you one of those who don't mind killing unborn babies?

Lawmaker: 40 Democrats Oppose Health Care Bill Without Abortion Ban

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
July 22, 2009
lifenews.com

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- The leading pro-life Democrat in the House of Representatives says a total of 40 Democratic lawmakers would vote to oppose a health care bill on the House floor unless it explicitly included language banning taxpayer-funded abortion and insurance mandates on abortion.

Rep. Bart Stupak, a Michigan congressman, has been one of the leaders in making the government-run health bill the House is considering abortion free.

This afternoon, Stupak said he is "optimistic" that the House Energy and Commerce Committee will adopt pro-life amendments to the health care bill that would make it abortion free. The panel could vote as soon as Thursday on the amendments.

Should the committee reject the amendments, Stupak tells CBS News that he thinks three dozen Democrats will walk and repeatedly vote against the bill or rules for debate on it.

"I think if they do not have [the pro-life amendments] in there and President Obama says we are going to have a bill with nothing in there on abortion, I think it is going to backfire," he said. "I think we bring down the rule and it will be explicitly discussed in the health care plan one way or another."

Stupak said he is confident he will have "a minimum of thirty nine" Democrats who will join him in opposing the bill.

"If there is not direct language and we are denied our amendment we will focus our attention on the rule," Stupak warned.

Stupak said the pro-life and moderate Democrats would "demand" an up or down on the abortion funding limits before allowing the health care bill to move forward.

Before a bill can be debated on the House floor, the House Rules Committee adopts the rules for debate and Stupak's warning could mean votes against the rule both in committee and on the floor before the debate on the bill could get underway. That would block the legislation and could defeat the entire bill.

Stupak also responded to CBS about the comments President Obama made Tuesday night in an interview with Katie Couric about abortion and health care.

Obama said he did not want to "wade into" the issue of whether the health care bill would allow abortion funding and insurance mandates, and appeared to say he didn't favor allowing that.

Stupak said the abortion funding debate has to happen on the House floor eventually.

"You can't talk about health care and reproductive rights [without abortion]," Stupak said. "You cannot not talk about it. It is central to all of the things we have been doing."

"The president was elected to make tough decisions, just as I was elected to make tough decisions," Stupak said. "These are tough decisions, you don't run from them."

Stupak's number of 40 Democrats likely includes the 20, including him, who signed a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in June saying they will not support any health care restructuring bill that does not explicitly prevent abortion funding and coverage.

Pelosi received another letter yesterday from four more Democrats who didn't make the same absolutist statement but urged that abortion limits be included.