Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (537750)	12/20/2009 7:35:46 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577030

> Not really. Yeah, really, totally. > It is still mandatory insurance. It is not mandatory. There are millions and millions of Americans who don't have car insurance. If you want to drive a car on city streets you may be required to have it, but you can choose not to. There is a near 100% probability that, if this bill is signed into law, this provision will be challenged on constitutional grounds, and there is a pretty good possibility it will not be sustained. I am opposed to requiring liability insurance. But the rationale for it make a lot more sense than the health insurance requirement.