SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (20004)4/30/2010 7:02:05 AM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 86356
 
Of course, its still true.

Every nation but ours recognizes this. No other nation embargoes much of its own energy resources. Example: Norway - has lots of offshore oil and gas developments despite the No Sea being a pretty rough piece of water, despite their fishing industry, despite their tourist industry, .... etc.



To: Road Walker who wrote (20004)4/30/2010 10:05:15 AM
From: Eric  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 86356
 
Nah.. Oil can't pollute. I just want to cry because of the damage I know is about to happen.

This is going to be much, much worse than the Exxon Valdez because of where it is happening. This area is the most critical habitat area for wildlife in the United States. Not to mention fishing.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News