Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cactus Jack who wrote (63880)	5/26/2010 11:29:15 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219671

Naw... you just got sucked into our convoluted logic!! LOL... somewhere way back when it was mentioned gold was probably "the last great trade of our lifetime". THAT has still to be seen. :)) I'm still wondering if the Fed will keep expanding it's balance sheet or monitize what it has going forward given the latest table pounding by R. Wing. Of course that's probably nothing, and even may appear STUPID given the coming "tough luv" of unemployment rates doubling again. DAK

To: Cactus Jack who wrote (63880)	5/27/2010 10:22:01 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219671

i speak for myself and i am sure for dak, that nothing pleases me more than sharing salvation with another fwiw, i believe gold is still the single asset in which we can afford to focus on, and in size if we are to judge gold in comparison to other one time goodies and we must note that home building index portrays a bubble that was usa specific; nasdaq was oecd particular; whereas gold, the primal and eternal, is universal even as i am certain gold will prove more volatile than it ever was, eventually to do three digits daily movements in both directions. and, a warning to myself that, sure, gold can certainly re-visit 750.