Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dybdahl who wrote (18841)	8/15/2010 9:06:41 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

I think that most of the push-back on this has been because you originally said "property," not "undeveloped rural property." I know that I assumed something close to "back yard." (As I said, I don't have even a back yard. My "property" is the interior of a condominium apartment. ) Since hardly anyone has more than five acres, the notion that the law wouldn't apply to one's yard as opposed to one's "back 40" just didn't occur. The principle is the same but the level of outrage is much less when the tent isn't within eyesight or hearing of the home.

To: dybdahl who wrote (18841)	8/15/2010 10:29:34 AM
From: skinowski	Respond to of 42652

Nice description. Makes me want to travel in Sweden. So far all I've seen were a few areas near Copenhagen - and briefly, Malmo, Lund. Maybe if and when I retire it would be nice to spend a couple of summer months traveling in northern Europe. So far most conversations I had with Swedes took place in ski hangouts, like Chamonix.... :)