SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (73992)9/3/2010 6:10:55 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
MQ it is not turning as TJ, predicted: The revolutyionaries appear a clean, well, behaved lot.

Not the International-singing red banner-carriers, violent lot TJ envisaged.

Read on please:
arktimes.com
Let the teabaggers roar on the Capitol mall today. Nice day for a rally. But their adoption of a persecution/victimization theme is a little ironic, don't you think? To accept Glenn Beck as the new M.L. King is beyond irony



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (73992)9/3/2010 6:12:50 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
And funded by two billionaires, mind you...speaking of the Kochs, Frank Rich also wrote Sunday about the billionaires feeding the Tea Party movement. Rich suggests a simple question (will the 'baggers ever realize they are being used, ultimately to their disadvantage?):



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (73992)9/9/2010 1:32:08 PM
From: Joseph Silent  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
The idea that there is

somewhere to get to which is better than here is only an idea. We are hamsters on a treadmill trying to convince ourselves that being on a treadmill is progress. Stepping off is psychologically hard for us to view as progress even though we know that destruction (destroying the treadmill?) can also lead to progress. Our notion of progress is always measured relative to some previous or "poorer" state, but since we cannot guarantee that our current ("progressive") trajectory is leading us in the right direction (as any student of greedy algorithms can attest), there is no guarantee that serious regress is not in our future --- a regress caused by our path.

Historian J. Bury, 1920:

"To the minds of most people the desirable outcome of human development would be a condition of society in which all the inhabitants of the planet would enjoy a perfectly happy existence....It cannot be proved that the unknown destination towards which man is advancing is desirable. The movement may be Progress, or it may be in an undesirable direction and therefore not Progress..... The Progress of humanity belongs to the same order of ideas as Providence or personal immortality. It is true or it is false, and like them it cannot be proved either true or false. Belief in it is an act of faith."

I don't see that as nihilism. Once the mind is not completely obsessed by the future, thereby depriving us of the experience of the present --- and by this I mean genuine experience of living, free from our usual, comfort-seeking distracted state of being, we have a chance of recognizing that the mind misleads as well as it leads, and thus thinking is not equal to intelligence.

That may be why Einstein said "intuition is the most important thing", instead of saying "make sure you spend a lot of time thinking, or else the chimpanzees will catch up."

Incidentally .... the chimpanzees may have caught up. They are now in positions of administration everywhere you turn. .... education, government, defense ....

:)