Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (8994)	11/11/1997 4:00:00 PM
From: Scrapps	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22053

Well Glenn ROK didn't say anything in that long release of FUD about the particulars of just what it is Bay Networks is doing wrong. Isn't Bay putting x2 in some of their equipment that also has K56Flex?

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (8994)	11/11/1997 5:05:00 PM
From: David Lawrence	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22053

>>Rockwell Semiconductor Systems Tuesday announced that it has filed a suit against Bay Networks charging that the company has breached its K56flex high-speed modem technology licensing agreement with Rockwell. According to Rockwell, Bay Networks' current business practices violate its K56flex licensing agreement with Rockwell and their actions competitively disadvantage K56flex licensees. "Rockwell is committed to ensuring a level competitive playing field for all K56flex licensees," said Dwight Decker, Rockwell Semiconductor Systems' president. Do I detect a chink in the Consortium armor? By the way, I believe this is >>> #9000 <<<