Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (619875)	7/18/2011 11:56:31 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577020

If they can force you to buy a product you don't want and may not need, just by merely existing, there are no limitations whatsoever. Did you read Sutton's ruling? They are not forcing you to buy anything...they are merely forcing you to pay for what you already get for free...let's put it this way, if the SC repeals the individual mandate then we should not require ERs to abide by COBRA/EMTALA...is that ok with you? Al

To: i-node who wrote (619875)	7/18/2011 2:30:17 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577020

While the Court isn't always convinced by slippery slope arguments, this one is so glaring and in your face that it is difficult to imagine a pro-Obama decision. Don't bet on it. At best, the decision will be 5 to 4 against Obama. Of course Kagan should recuse .....but she won't. This country is but one unfortunate illness away from from a nightmare supreme court. Three liberal, women from NYC. Now there's judicial diversity for you.