SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neeka who wrote (57)8/29/2011 4:31:29 PM
From: Steve Lokness  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 85487
 
<<<<<< think this thread just might tear down some walls. >>>>>>

I hope you're right as that is needed for sure. Seems to me that so far though this is just another right leaning, God supporting bunch that want more religion in government. Time will tell if this is really for "mainstream" politics or is something it pretends not to be. If this is but another site where groups of same thought sit around stroking each other pretending to be neutral - while secretly pushing a point of view, then it will only be another in a long list of worthless sites. Test will be on Paul. I'm not real convinced his site is what he suggest - but I'm willing to give him a chance.



To: Neeka who wrote (57)8/29/2011 5:16:35 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Neeka, why is it OK for the state government to decide the issue of abortion for the individual, but not the Federal Government?



To: Neeka who wrote (57)8/29/2011 5:32:19 PM
From: Carolyn1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Right now, Roe vs Wade is the law of the land. It stands. I do not think a president should bother with abortion because it is so divisive and personal. If a person wants one, she can pay for it.

However, I DO believe partial birth abortion is murder and should be prohibited totally, for any reason.