SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kashish King who wrote (26150)11/24/1997 8:25:00 PM
From: James Yu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1585881
 
Rod,
The Controversy of Java:
- SUN: Java, Java, Java, All of mine(platform)
- MSFT: Java, a program language.

Here are some articles of Java which may help us a little bit
to understand it.

techweb.com

Click on, "Sun's Tribble on Wintel and Java",
then click on Related Stories, "Java: Write Once Fat Chance" and
"Wintel's Wailing Tells Us Java's Here To Stay"

Best wishes

James




To: Kashish King who wrote (26150)11/25/1997 2:37:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1585881
 
Rod, I believe you are right about Java's potential being much greater than most people think. I've read about a pure Java shareware Internet Browser which is as fast as Netscape and IE. Since Java runs on a "virtual machine," it reduces the value of code compatibility with the venerable 'x86' instruction set.

I don't think Intel is ahead of AMD in this area. I have heard that the K7 will be able to be run in a direct RISC mode without the x86->RISC conversion. Intel won't have this until the Merced a year later. Meanwhile, companies like IDT sell 64 bit, 200 MIPS RISC CPU's for $39 in quantity -- and make a profit on them because of tiny die sizes.

The biggest threat to Java is sabotage by Microsoft. BTW, is it true that an Active-X control downloaded from a web site could contain the "F0" bug and lock up a web surfer's Pentium machine?

Petz