Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FCL - FuelCell Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (66)	11/26/1997 1:46:00 AM
From: Zeuspaul	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 407

>>Nevertheless there is a clear relationship between per capita gross product and per capita energy consumption<< Then it would make more sense to increase energy consumption as we would then have a greater per capita gross product. I think of energy as a way to improve ones standard of living and leverage ourselves into the future with greater strides than we have already achieved. Surely the greater per capita gross product could be properly invested to everyones mutual benefit. (my electric bill is up with all my computers running so much of the time, the office is now the warmest room in the house!) Why a geological period? I know of houses made of wood that are several centuries old. Trees live to several hundred years and in some cases thousands. In 300 years we might have a better idea about whether or not there is a real problem with greenhouse gases.