Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: old 'n cranky who wrote (28866)	10/14/2012 2:06:48 PM
From: Joseph B. Schmidt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

Smearing a stranger with ZERO evidence. That's your interpretation, not mine. It's called investigative reporting. I didn't bring up the possible connection and didn't know about it until someone else posted it. I took it from there. Perhaps you need to reread the posts. Message 28471143 Message 28471159 Message 28471163 The bottom line - who leaked the SAIC report and who did they leak it to? Whoever possessed the report, be it an insider at JBI or one of the PIPE investors and whoever else JBI determined could see it (knowing ahead of time it was confidential and not to be released to the public or anyone else JBI didn't approve it to be released to by informing them it was confidential and for their eyes only) knew it was confidential but decided to be reckless and pass it on to someone who decided to set an account up at investorshangout for the purpose of posting the selected part of the report. And I also posted that Mr. Thompson may be an innocent bystander.