Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PaperProphet who wrote (28877)	10/15/2012 12:09:11 AM
From: PaperProphet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53574

When I asked what I violated, I got: Kurt, please accept the following as constructive criticism, and my opinion. Your tone is mocking and incendiary. It looks like trolling. You also draw conclusions, and state opinions as facts, without evidence. Your point about a ‘fabled’ catalyst is an example, and enough cause for deletion. It may be a ‘fable’. If that is your opinion, say so respectfully. If you have supporting facts, better. No one has any responsibility to answer your questions in the tone presented. Posters are not defendants in a criminal case that you are prosecuting. Your delivery shows self- appointed expertise while making others responsible for your questions. Try presenting your questions as ‘I’ statements. Put yourself out there. I’ll let it stand. I do believe you have valid points in your post that could be important to an investor or potential investor. I also believe you couch your points in words that show that your ego is more important than the message. Please say the word verbose while rereading your own post. On the other hand, JB’s claims are independent of his verbosity in disseminating them. JB’s verbosity is not on-topic. If P2O ever flows at the verbose rate that words are created on the JBII SMB’s…well, I think you get the picture. You are a writer. Expect more from yourself before others in this regard. Dispute whatever you wish about the company, but it is not necessary or valuable to be snarky on this board. It is not IHUB or SI; I find both those boards lacking. IH is a new paradigm as a SMB. It is a site for the investor. The investor has more at stake than anybody. IH has a style defined by its Terms and Conditions. I intend to help. Rewrite your post with the Terms and Conditions, and my PM to you, in mind. See my post #1075 which stickyed at the main JBII page. Then your post will stand, and inappropriate responses will be deleted. Regards, Paul

To: PaperProphet who wrote (28877)	10/15/2012 12:53:49 AM
From: the_big_guy	Respond to of 53574

I saw that this morning. Not sure why they felt threatened. Your reputation has preceded you.

To: PaperProphet who wrote (28877)	10/15/2012 10:46:23 AM
From: arvitar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

Well, consider who the Moderator and Assistant Moderators are on the IHang JBII board. The moderator was one of the avid pumpers for all four of Monk's Float Lockdown Scams and the Monkinars. When it all fell apart, he claimed he was an innocent duped victim. Now he's pushing JBII with the same ferocity as he did his previous poor investments. Possibly he suffers from serial-victim disorder and not being very smart, or he's just another dishonest penny stock promoter. His first Assistant Mod, "Big Tuna", goes by Ex Blockman on IHUB. He was Monk's main lieutenant for keeping the "Den Family" in line, sucking in financially desperate newbies to spend thousands of dollars on Monkinars so they could "daytrade the F's", etc. The other two Assistant Mods, well, you know who they are. IHANG's business appears to be to serve as a forum for IHUB promoters to do as they please with less constraints than IHUB. They get their clicks, since that kind of thing attracts some attention, and they sell advertising.