Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (23715)	12/4/1997 7:15:00 PM
From: Kurt N	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

I'm no legal expert, but it sounds absurd that a lawsuit has to be refiled because of a name change. If that's the way the legal system is, no wonder it is screwed up and lawyers make big bucks. A name change doesn't affect the legal merits (if any). So, if Dempsey Mork were to change his name. Any lawsuits/counter-suits against him would have to be refiled????? Kurt

To: michael d kugler who wrote (23715)	12/4/1997 7:16:00 PM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Hello Mike: bottomline, when did Baron's/Nelson's 144 shares come off restriction? Did Olympus file suit before the restrictions were lifted? Thanks, Kenny

To: michael d kugler who wrote (23715)	12/4/1997 10:48:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

So are you saying OVIS filed suit first?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (23715)	12/5/1997 6:06:00 AM
From: shades	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Baron's/Nelson's lawyer, Ed Guerera told me he had filed a countersuit in his response to Olympus' suit. He also told me he has had to refile because of the name change. I thank you for admitting that to us, but why only after you were directly questioned? Why did you not give us all the facts from the start and only release half truths? If you are really here to save me don't keeep me in the dark. The way you stated it eariler, I do not remember anything about you saying it was a countersuit, which does not seem as damaging, until people realized the court it was files in was an appeals court and then you fessed up with the info, why are you vague?