Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (38546)	7/3/2013 2:19:03 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

Brumar can readily embrace something so infinitely improbable as the "Big Bang", Creation ex nihilo, but has lots of difficulty with abiogenesis & the evolving emergence of self replicating molecules, what a total self contradicting shmoo! Intellectually confused to put it mildly ... (its being caught up so much having to bend over reaching around to pull "thoughts" out of his arse so often) ;o)

To: Solon who wrote (38546)	7/3/2013 9:21:19 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

There is also an outright lie, in the statement that “[t]he simplest life is equivalent to modern bacteria.” No abiogenesis hypothesis actually states that the simplest life is as complex as modern bacteria, and if it did, it wouldn’t be a very good hypothesis at all. They are such scammers, their hypothesis of spontaneous generation "presto", isn't very likely either. Maybe to little kids that have seen one too many animated fantasies. One aspect of abiogenesis research has clearly established is that "Life" itself is an ambiguous term and there is a continuum between non-life and life and organisms such as viruses or prions occupy a place on that continuum which is difficult to define. Just the idea that creationists propose of life being magically generated with fully formed structure & complexity , certainly is a far less probable possibility to be almost rediculous.