Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (24824)	12/8/1997 10:48:00 AM
From: Michael P. Weber	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

<The quantity of lawsuits and pending lawsuits are troubling. Are professionals judged differently if they make an inaccurate statement? Much has been made regarding a professional's comments, and hopefully for all those that post, litigation will not become so common that we all are afraid to post our opinions. Your reinforcement of your professional investigative skills lend much credibility to your posts. I hope that posters understand that the majority of us post our opinions or copy information that may or may not support one's opinion. The concentration on professionals being open to litigation is occurring too often in this country, and what is going on here is an example of that. I do not believe that Mike Kugler, Principal, nor Riley G. should be involved in lawsuits, or additional ones.> VERY WISE WORDS TONTO!! One question though. Does this mean that Mike and his company have been added to the existing lawsuit? Funny Mike said last night that he hadn't been served yet! TIA Mike

To: tonto who wrote (24824)	12/8/1997 11:07:00 AM
From: s martin	Respond to of 55532

Tonto, You have brought up a good point regarding professionals being held accountable due to their training. As a trained investigator, Riley, we know has the ability to find the same information that you, MK, myself and others have found. He may or may not have a legal obligation to disclose that information,but as the founder of this movement, IMO he has a moral duty. It would be difficult to believe with all the red flags that have been raised, that a person trained to investigate, would not have investigated. Some people who are buying into the squeeze theory may not be aware of the circumstances, but not all of them are. The constant threats of lawsuits are an attempt to intimidate which in itself is a form of manipulation. IMO

To: tonto who wrote (24824)	12/8/1997 12:00:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Tonto During the GIFS debacle, were there any threats of lawsuits? I never followed that one until the end but I seem to recall there was talk of that, were you involved in that in any way ? TIA

To: tonto who wrote (24824)	12/8/1997 2:08:00 PM
From: KMT	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Tonto: The concentration on professionals being open to litigation is occurring too often in this country, and what is going on here is an example of that. I do not believe that Mike Kugler, Principal, nor Riley G. should be involved in lawsuits, or additional ones. I agree with you for the most part. I sent RG an email earlier that I thought it was a shame he was named in one of Mork's suits, especially if it was because Mork was just trying to make things difficult for him. It's also regrettable that MK and his firm may be named in a future lawsuit. I do have a question for you though. Given that both RG and MK are trained "investigators" of a sort, is it surprising to you that RG has not been able to turn up the same information that MK has? He has even gone so far as to deny it after calling Morgan? As a trained professional I would have assumed he wouldn't take Morgan's word on it but verify it or refute it from independent sources. Why has MK been able to find out that 75% of the business is non-existant yet RG can't? As a trained professional, perhaps RG has been able to verify MK's information. Given that he is also the "cartel leader" he has an implied obligation to the cartel to release this information. If he's verified MK's information but has not disclosed it for whatever reason do you think other cartel members have a case against him if this stock tanks? It's sad, but the more I read this thread, the more I think some of the players on here (both sides) are a little more then typical SI thread participants. And if that's the case, they should go down with the ship, whether that be Mork or Morgan. Cheers, KMT