SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TideGlider who wrote (734923)8/26/2013 9:28:47 AM
From: Taro1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583406
 
What would Assad gain by using chemical weapons of civilians?

I am concerned that we may be suckered into the removal of another dictator only to be replaced by Islamic extremists.
It seems to me the Islamic Extremists may be the perpetrators of this horrible crime.

They are the only ones who would profit by it.


You are absolutely right and IMHO it doesn't call for Rocket Science to understand this, just a little bit of common sense and some level of logical deduction.

So, I have some serious problems truly believing that Obama, Merkel, Cameron and the French would be that dumb, IMO they also know and understand this.

Thus they must have a different agenda all together (for considering an attack), just don't know what that could be..

Anybody having a good idea?

/Taro



To: TideGlider who wrote (734923)8/26/2013 9:29:56 AM
From: Taro2 Recommendations

Recommended By
THE WATSONYOUTH
TideGlider

  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1583406
 
What would Assad gain by using chemical weapons of civilians?

I am concerned that we may be suckered into the removal of another dictator only to be replaced by Islamic extremists.
It seems to me the Islamic Extremists may be the perpetrators of this horrible crime.

They are the only ones who would profit by it.


You are absolutely right and IMHO it doesn't call for Rocket Science to understand this, just a little bit of common sense and some level of logical deduction.

So, I have some serious problems truly believing that Obama, Merkel, Cameron and the French would be that dumb, IMO they also know and understand this.

Thus they must have a different agenda all together (for considering an attack), just don't know what that could be..

Anybody having a good idea?

/Taro



To: TideGlider who wrote (734923)8/26/2013 9:55:03 AM
From: simplicity5 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
jlallen
one_less
Taro
TideGlider

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583406
 
Very good points, and I agree with them all. My point is that, while this mass 'genocide' (of sorts) is occurring, the American president is doing two things that are unseemly -- namely, talking about requiring a U.N. mandate in order to at least attempt to prevent thousands more deaths (it would appear that he believes the U.S. no longer has any power ... diplomatic, military or otherwise ... for good in the world unless we are working under the U.N. flag) ... and the fact that he chooses to spend five hours golfing during a day when so much devastation is occurring, and things are escalating out of control, is evidence of his own brand of unmitigated personal arrogance (not that we need any more evidence, mind you).