SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (748528)10/21/2013 10:24:41 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571808
 
>> To hammer the point, they should have went with Ruby on Rails 4.x and Ruby 2.x. But they went with PHP and .NET. So they were screwed from the beginning.

That's nonsense.

The problem isn't the development platform, it is politics and the legislation.

Because they didn't want the regs out before the election, they waited until afterward. You can't to a design, let alone write code, until the regs are issues and past the comment period.

And because they didn't want to show unsubsidized prices they made the idiotic mistake of trying to do the subsidy computation off of live data, which made a fairly simple task far more complex. But they knew no one would buy it without the subsidy.

Using an old version of asp was not a good decision. But it also isn't the core of the problem. As to scalability, .net is highly scalable. And traffic simply isn't the problem here, which was apparent to most of us about two days in.



To: combjelly who wrote (748528)10/21/2013 11:49:11 PM
From: Bonefish  Respond to of 1571808
 
The companies revenues were up 160%. Stock down 3% today. Wonder where the profits went.



To: combjelly who wrote (748528)10/22/2013 1:11:01 AM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
i-node

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571808
 
RE:they should have went with Ruby on Rails 4.x and Ruby 2.x. But they went with PHP and .NET

This shows a FAUX knowledge of web development. You would not use Ruby on Rails 4.x and 2.x on the same site, nor PHP and .NET at the same time. Ruby on Rails 4 was just released in June also.

It says right in this article they used Jekyll, which is a Ruby based tech.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"We started thinking about Jekyll as a platform and using Prose.io."After Sivak and his team read about Development Seed's work with Jekyll, they contacted the startup directly. After a little convincing, Development Seed agreed to consult on one more .gov project."


theatlantic.com

Quick-start Instructions

~ $ gem install jekyll

~ $ jekyll new my-awesome-site

~ $ cd my-awesome-site

~/my-awesome-site $ jekyll serve

# => Now browse to http://localhost:4000

jekyllrb.com



To: combjelly who wrote (748528)10/22/2013 2:49:40 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571808
 
CJ,
To hammer the point, they should have went with Ruby on Rails 4.x and Ruby 2.x. But they went with PHP and .NET.
I really doubt that the choice of language had much to do with the problems of ObamaCare.

"Some believed we lacked the programming language to describe your perfect world." - Agent Smith, The Matrix.

Tenchusatsu