SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (774228)3/11/2014 1:56:33 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Bilow

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1570939
 
Inode, nicotine isn't technically a narcotic, but it is often lumped in with narcotics because of its highly addictive properties.

The effects of marijuana, AFAIK, are more potent than that of tobacco. Those who claim that marijuana is less harmful are lying through their teeth, and I don't need to smoke that shit to know.

Drug companies are required by law to tightly control their products that are classified as narcotics. The amount of regulation here is very significant, and the drug makers themselves are very sensitive to the consequences of not obeying both the letter and the spirit of the law.

Besides, how do the drug companies benefit when their narcotics are stolen? They're not making a profit off of the stolen goods.

Tenchusatsu