SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (801953)8/16/2014 2:09:33 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570308
 
>> Of course then there are the other pertinent facts in the case. She was a Dem in a state where it would be better to be a criminal on the lam than a Dem. She headed an agency that identified corruption in the state. Many of those corrupt pols singled out by her agency were Rs. Apparently, Perry was under scrutiny.

The woman was inebriated. Not just drunk. Perry would have been acting inappropriately had he not called for her resignation. I don't think withholding the money was the best course of action -- but there is nothing illegal about a governor threatening veto then carrying out the threat.

I am willing to let the courts decide this issue. Are you?



To: i-node who wrote (801953)8/16/2014 2:11:19 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bentway

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1570308
 
CJ saying that Perry was under scrutiny is not the same as it being true.

It is true, Dave. Just google it.

Perry made the mistake of threatening to veto funding unless she stepped down. Then he did veto the funding and offered to restore it if she stepped down.

This is bribery of a public official.

Now Perry's woes with CPRIT are even more interesting. Perry was using it to reward big donors.

texastribune.org
dallasnews.com
blog.chron.com

Perry is as corrupt as they come. AFAIK, he hasn't ordered a hit on someone. But I wouldn't put it past him.