SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Harvey Allen who wrote (14933)12/15/1997 11:05:00 PM
From: John F. Dowd  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 24154
 
Then Randall misunderstood what was said at the conference or was asleep. MSFT explained that disentangling the browser from the latest OS was like straightening out a bowl of spaghetti the; items were inextricably entwined. The only OS they could offer on short notice in response to the judges ruling (which in itself was outside the scope of the question put by DOJ) was either one that wouldn't boot because to separate the 2 items would render the system inoperable or an older system that would operate but would lack the ability to sign on to the network of the evil empire and some other minor details. Certainly MSFT is not going to build a new OS before the merits of the case are resolved especially when their consent decree w/ DOJ only involved Windows 95.

I was quite assured by MSFT but I had to wonder what the analysts in attendance had for breakfast.

This whole case is pathetic and has far reaching consequences concerning the ownership of intellectual property.



To: Harvey Allen who wrote (14933)12/15/1997 11:36:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
Harvey, isn't the orignal Windows95 what's for sale on retail shelves anyway? Unless something's changed recently, it sure isn't OSR2. If it's good enough for the retail market, it's good enough for the OEMs.:-).

Cheers, Dan.