Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zengold who wrote (4604)	2/27/2016 9:46:26 AM
From: GMPInvestor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12350

That Will Purcells guy that NC loves to use his analogies very accurately I might add called CCB a "promotion" Wonder if he stole that line from me. Very accurate I might add. No bash and tout campaign I think you see Ccb trading at 2-3 cents IMO No Gus you are smarter than me. You have picked a real winner. Ya right when pigs fly buddy. When pigs fly. Choo Choo

To: Zengold who wrote (4604)

2/27/2016 10:12:15 AM

From: GrumpyGus

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12350

There's nothing poetic about the numbers. In reality, they're not great. But it was a poorly designed programme, and still hit several veins/pods of ore.

Drillhole	Azimuth, degrees	Inclination, degrees	From, m	To, m	Interval, m*	%Cg
DDH13-15	275	50	6.00	7.80	1.80	48.60
		including	6.00	6.50	0.50	63.20
DDH13-14	275	45	4.00	7.50	3.50	6.80
		including	4.00	4.30	0.30	50.50
DDH13-11	240	55	10.00	12.30	2.30	8.10
		including	10.00	10.90	0.90	11.00
DDH13-12	245	45	11.50	22.00	10.50	2.00
		including	16.50	21.00	4.50	3.50
DDH13-17	280	45	2.00	15.00	13.00	1.00
		including	4.80	9.10	4.30	1.60 canadacarbon.com

To: Zengold who wrote (4604)	2/27/2016 12:12:32 PM
From: GrumpyGus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12350

Zengold, helo reported the 13 m of 1% graphite from the same source as I did. How come there was no issue with a source there? Why is it that a lousy looking number gets a free pass, but when better numbers are used to support a statement, now you want a source? Normally I would have included the news release link as a matter of course, but since I was responding to helo, and he had obviously used that chart for his numbers, I didn't see any purpose to linking it. Anybody could have looked it up, as we both did.