Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1013555)	4/27/2017 3:02:49 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	4 Recommendations Recommended By Bonefish miraje POKERSAM Taro Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578011

Wharfie, Fact: the Supreme Court said CO2 was a pollutant. No they didn't. The EPA classified CO2 as a "pollutant" to be regulated. The Supreme Court only affirmed the EPA's authority to do that according to the written laws. Even so, I don't accept the government's assertion that CO2 emissions have anything to do with public health. Even if the Supreme Court ruled that 2+2=5, it doesn't make it right. Tenchusatsu