SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (57182)2/20/2018 12:00:43 PM
From: i-node2 Recommendations

Recommended By
gamesmistress
TimF

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 360802
 
>> As to your question, making semi-automatics highly restricted would have little impact. Other than engaging in mass killings, the zombie apocalypse and highly contrived scenarios like "imagine a dozen or so blah people, hopped up on bath salts, break into your house, intent on killing your family", it would make no difference.

Allowing dogs to search cars for marijuana without a warrant makes no difference.

Not reading one his rights makes no difference. Or giving him an attorney paid for by the state.

"No-knock" warrants make no difference.

Arresting people for protesting makes no difference.

Small incursions into individual rights make no difference. As long as they're small.

Right?



To: combjelly who wrote (57182)2/20/2018 1:44:03 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 360802
 
Other than engaging in mass killings, the zombie apocalypse...

It wouldn't help with the zombie apocalypse. You have to shoot them in the head, which you probably manage with a full clip but it would be a real waste of bullets and zombies come in packs. <g>

...it would make no difference.

The only practical difference I've been able to come up with on my own, without the help of gun advocates, would be depriving hobbyists of fun at the range. There may be private security uses that are outside my range of knowledge, but that could be handled through licensing.

I only know of one person who has one. He got it for his survival stash in case of the total breakdown of civilization and, probably, mostly, because it satisfies his need for a complete set of alpha toys. I don't know that he's ever shot it. Don't know him well enough to ask.



To: combjelly who wrote (57182)3/1/2018 11:28:03 AM
From: TimF1 Recommendation

Recommended By
i-node

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 360802
 
Despite having one in your house makes you 3 times more likely to die of gun violence.

In addition to any doubt about the statistics showing the correlation, this is a prime case of remembering that correlation does not equal causation. Someone in a situation where they might be at risk to be shot, is much more likely to want to have a gun.