Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SteveG who wrote (8919)	1/13/1998 9:20:00 PM
From: Galirayo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21342

[ Chat ] Steve, I don't think you get it. You are missing something. People Skills? You can still get your point across and be Diplomatic at the same time. At least there are a lot of people who can. There are many people today who convey their ideas everyday without being condescending or demeaning. Do as you wish. Just call em names and treat em like dirt. They will respect you for that. <ggggg> >>>==>it would have nothing to do with your being an Amati cheerhead, would it? >>>==> Charthead would be more accurate. But by all means think as you do. Don't let me sway you, Steve. I'm done. Save your fingers. Ray.

To: SteveG who wrote (8919)	1/14/1998 5:22:00 PM
From: Trey McAtee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21342

steve-- here is the info i was trying to explain to you. MU supposedly beat estimates, but they had to incorporate a non-recurring gain to do so. it didnt really matter since the company was rewarded for using the one time gain to compute EPS. Message 3169054 just thought that since you have done such an excellent job denigrating me, you would want to read this and understand what i have tried to say. companies are rewarded for beating estimates, it doesnt really matter how. good luck to all, trey