To: jimmy who wrote (6451 ) 1/16/1998 1:11:00 PM From: Jonathan Brown Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10368
Without further information, I'm inclined to agree with Jimmy. I'm neutral on the implications, but my gut tells me this move means further near-term downside risk, if only because it's possible Wilson will increase the float by selling his shares, which may be part of the deal for his departure. This is only a speculation. The company may buy him out and put his shares in the company treasury, leaving the float alone. We shall see. AB&G certainly was gung-ho to get its warrant money, in which it was only partly successful. Yet we have heard nothing of how that money will be used. So what was the big rush about? Both warrantholders and stockholders got screwed, the stock has broken long-term support (which even the warrant call didn't manage to accomplish as effectively), and from what little I can tell, the company is moving toward greater exposure in a highly controversial business. With all due respect, I must disagree with Patti and Ricardo: the fundamentals have changed. The company's business plan is shifting, the atmosphere in a key market has become threatening, and the founder is leaving the company. For me, that qualifies as change. Do I sound like a short? Even if I wanted to, which I don't, I couldn't short this stock through Datek. Nor am I attempting to provoke selling to pick up cheap shares. (I don't have to; the articles posted from "The State" accomplish that far more powerfully than I ever could. By the way, is the "The State" a tabloid? Its bias is truly exemplary. I'm thinking of writing my friends in the liberal media about this paper. They might learn something.) But I am concerned. Let's hope clarification beyond an upbeat press release is forthcoming. Soon. Patience is a virtue (I'm told); let's hope it is rewarded. Like meekness. J