SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (320035)10/28/2019 12:20:28 PM
From: Cautious_Optimist2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Cogito Ergo Sum
pocotrader

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361715
 
I feel it's better to listen and find the core of another person's thoughts rather than be defensive. That goes for me too. And humor always helps.

In many cases you are very deep and wise, Koan. So is everyone here.

However, when you say, for example, Republicans/conservatives are always bad and Democrats/liberals are always good, it is like christofascism -- there is no room for listening or discussing with any space for growth or self-examination of assumptions. Democrats and Republicans, like families and personal life experiences, have gone through many cycles over decades.

I do not subscribe to us/them thinking.

Or me right/you wrong. Man/woman. Republican/Democrat. Left/Right. IMHO, binary thinking is obsolete in a "quantum" mindful reality. (And later, probably beyond quantum and incomprehensible currently.)

So I am sort of binary about binary thinking; that's a bug not a feature. I'm a little embarrassed. The reason RW Republicans are not in Sioux Nation has to do with the common incivility and trolling that poison discussion, tolerance and fun. That's a feature here, not a bug.

Trump's behavior is inside all humans. Even the late great Martin Luther King and JFK had a dick-side. And great women are capable of beautiful and shitty too. Just sayin'. We must illuminate everyone, every human, by a broader multi-dimensional light. OK, maybe not McConnell, Giuliani or Cheney. I have to think about that. ;-)

psychologytoday.com

weforum.org



To: koan who wrote (320035)10/28/2019 3:10:10 PM
From: elpolvo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361715
 
koan-
You think it is a moot point to explain why one believes what they do?

in most cases i would answer NO... but when it's obvious, overstated, redundant
and re-explained to those who are already aware of your motives for your beliefs
(as in THIS case)... my answer is YES. especially when they hold the SAME beliefs
you do. that actually shows signs of forgetfulness or inattention to whom you're talking
rather than thoroughness, or helpfulness towards another's clear understanding.

i'm not disrespecting age related mental decline. i'll be one of the first to raise
my hand when asked if my mind and my memory is less sharp than it was ten
years ago or even one year ago. if you see signs of this in my posts, please
ask for clarification - we're all aging here - perfect communication is more
difficult as we age and i'm always happy to try to improve mine.

i'm not lecturing you on what to post... nor am i debating you on what you believe.
i'm merely asking for clarification in order to understand you better. from my honest
perspective, i'm looking for ways that you and i can work together toward our common
goals. we have many. from most of your replies to me it seems you see me as an enemy
with a hidden agenda when i question you. i almost always feel you are seeking an apology
from me for questioning you. am i wrong about that feeling? i sincerely hope so.

i apologize... again... but i'll always have questions.
here's a simple one that most concerns me NOW...

do you forgive me?

-elpolvo