Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Walp who wrote (1168)	1/25/1998 9:51:00 PM
From: Rmn	Respond to of 20981

Good point Dave, never thought of that. Broncos just won the best super bowl I'v seen in years Ramsey

To: Dave Walp who wrote (1168)	1/25/1998 10:22:00 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

The N.Y. Post has an interesting theory about the hundreds of women who might sue, Dave. When did they say that? I agree more with Monica's ALLEGED comment in the tapes, however--that he is in denial about the Paula Jones case. I also think both Clintons have been living with a bunker mentality since the early eighties or something--always thinking the right is out to get you and that is the ONLY thing going on doesn't support mental health very well.

To: Dave Walp who wrote (1168)	1/25/1998 10:50:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

>>His "Pattern" is admissable in Paula Jones' case<< More irony. This is brand new law since Judge Thomas was given a "High Tech Lynching". That's where we all learned that women don't lie.

To: Dave Walp who wrote (1168)	1/26/1998 11:13:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 20981

The N.Y. Post thinks its because he has "hundreds" of women who might sue looking for lucrative settlements. Sue for what? And what is he supposed to have done to Jones, anyway? As noted previously, weird as he undoubtedly is, I find it a bit of a stretch to imagine that he began waving his willy around without any preamble. I mean, she might have laughed or something. I certainly would have done. And yes, I can imagine him doing hand-on-your-thigh stuff with staffers, but I don't see himself actually forcing himself on anyone, or making threats. Why should he bother? I'm sure most, if not all, of these alleged legions of chicks threw themselves at him.