SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (432162)3/6/2020 11:28:12 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 540785
 
"In the end the progressive will win the day"
That end is at least 4 years away.

Warren didn't endorse Sanders in '16. Why would she do it now?

"And where did Biden win? He won the low information areas of the country i.e. the South and rural areas"
Are you calling Black Dems low info? Are you calling Ma. and Me voters low info?



To: koan who wrote (432162)3/6/2020 12:19:13 PM
From: Alex MG  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 540785
 
>...The progressives are still upset that Warren did not endorse Bernie in 2016

well bless their little hearts.... and fuck them :^)

it's weird that you seem to speak for all progressives, it's like a person can't be a progressive unless they pledge allegiance to Bernie

as I said, I would have preferred Warren over either bernie or biden

I think she's smarter than both of them put together




To: koan who wrote (432162)3/6/2020 2:09:55 PM
From: JohnM3 Recommendations

Recommended By
abuelita
cosmicforce
Wharf Rat

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 540785
 
Just a quick reply to this longish statement, koan. As I read the returns from last Tuesday and the slim polling we are getting ahead of next week's votes, the major thing happening is a very, very large shift toward the argument that the Dems just have to beat Trump. Whichever is most likely. And large, large swaths of voters have concluded Biden is most likely to do that. Very different from ideological splits. Which, to the degree they remain, will hand the presidency back to Trump.

As for calling black voters in the south, low information voters, I would scold you if that would help. On the basis of everything I've read/heard/seen those black voters are very high information (many waited until the South Carolina results were in before deciding how to vote, very pragmatic (just beat Trump), and so on). It's definitely not low information; just different bets on the future. Beating Trump and gaining control of Congress is the first and second and third order of business.