Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (38206)	1/26/1998 11:10:00 AM
From: Mr. Dendro	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

Tonto: I'm glad to see someone finally address the issue of morality with this stock. Riley, Pugs and others have characterized this squeeze as a way to take control of the market from evil, manipulative MMs. If that is the goal I doubt that this squeeze, however successful, will accomplish that. This is, when one gets down to it, a small-time squeeze in a small-time stock. If it works, a few people will make a lot of money, but it will not affect any lasting changes in the OTC market. The thing that's always bothered me about the concept of a squeeze is that if it works, the cartel is just as guilty of artificially manipulating the price of the stock as the MMs. The only difference is that instead of artificially manipulating the price downward, they are manipulating it upward, to levels not supported by any fundamentals. The end goal, and result, is the same. Someone is getting rich at the expense of somebody else. If Riley and the other cartel members were serious about market reform, they could put their efforts into gathering evidence of an illegal short position, take that to the SEC, and ask them to address the situation. That said, I'm not in a position to throw stones, since I bought the stock in response to the notion that the price would increase due to the short squeeze. As time has gone on, however, and I have learned more about RMIL, I have grown more and more bothered about a squeeze that will benefit a company that has been demonstrated to be less than truthful.

To: tonto who wrote (38206)	1/26/1998 12:08:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 55532

Tonto, Your 'history' is relevant to this thread. You can review the GIFS thread and you will see the posts where you are claiming to buy very large blocks of GIFS. Now, it has been claimed that you "faxed" documentation of your position and the attorneys were not satisfied with that because faxes could be doctored. You have failed to respond to this question, why? We not only have documented our position with certs , certs #'s etc....we are very upfront about it. We are not making any claims we coudn't back up. As far as RMIL "trading under their terms"...<LOL>!! RMIL would have to be fools indeed to put themselves at the mercy of MM's who are 5-6MM shares short without the cash recieved yet! Get real!! I applaud RMIL's strategy and , in the end, it will bust the short! Pugs