SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Janice Shell who wrote (1744)1/26/1998 6:55:00 PM
From: Triluminary  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
And once again--this is getting old--Clinton's behavior with women should be his (and their) business, and no on else's.

I say once again: Bill's sex life isn't relevant to his job performance. I mean the REAL job.

The question isn't whether Bill's sex life is relevant to his job performance as I'm sure you're aware. It is whether or not he lied under oath. It is the question of whether he engaged in sexual harassment against Paula Jones. The President in his "REAL job" is not above the law.

Regards,

mark_b



To: Janice Shell who wrote (1744)1/26/1998 6:59:00 PM
From: Lady Lurksalot  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
 
Oooh, Janice, you tread dangerous ground when you seek inside information on the subject of Ginger. Perhaps you are not aware that during a gathering of a select few of The Great Minds at an exclusive enclave on the coast of Northern California sometime last summer, it was determined that Ginger is the real brains behind you-know-what.

In the interest of security, this message will now self-destruct. In fact, I had to write this message twice, for during the first writing my computer gave a memory parity error and the system halted. Really scary, don't you think? We must be careful. Very, very careful.

Holly



To: Janice Shell who wrote (1744)1/26/1998 8:11:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
 
But perjury is OK?

Even teachers and college presidents have moral turpitude clauses in their contracts. At this level it should be implied.

So you favor giving Packwood his Senate seat back?



To: Janice Shell who wrote (1744)1/27/1998 9:59:00 AM
From: Larry Dreher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
 
Bill's sex life isn't relevant to his job?

I beg to differ. What it shows is an amazing lack of judgement and
disregard for the american people. Conducting yourself in this
manner leaves you open to blackmail. I'm assuming the president
himself couldn't get a security clearance if he had to meet the same
criteria as an "average" citizen.

Look at the situation with Iraq now. Because of Slick, an already
complicated situation has gotten much worse. Complicated foreign
policy can lead to deaths.

Are you willing to volunteer yourself or your children to fight Sadam
now that he is emblazened by Slick's lack of judgement?

Larry