Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (3263)	1/29/1998 10:54:00 AM
From: Frank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Duncan, Could you please share with us just one INDISPUTABLE FACT" as to what leads you to believe these allegations? More IF you can,would be appreciated. Remember, something we can accept as FACT.As if you were the judge. Let's say you find him guilty, so based on what FACTS, up to this point. Thanks Frank

To: Zoltan! who wrote (3263)	1/29/1998 11:05:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

No, at worst, he will only wind up bolstering the case against Clinton by unwittingly corroborating her story about the "Creep". Sorry, but a "creep" otherwise identified only as a "high official" could be anyone. (Or no one, for that matter.) The guy's said she never mentioned Clinton by name. No proof of anything at all here. As for the famed divorce lawyer: he's entitled to his opinion, but I suspect Lewinsky isn't looking nearly as good to a great many people as she was a few days ago. Note also: as we've seen in the case of Clinton himself, the public tends to turn against people they feel have been having them on. Those who defended Monica as a vulnerable innocent may be feeling a little silly, and a little used, by now...