Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (6393)	9/18/2020 10:21:09 AM
From: Gib Bogle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13876

That's incredible! Was there much more vegetation around the house before the last fire? It's hard to see how the current situation could create intense heat near the house.

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (6393)	9/18/2020 2:05:15 PM
From: flashforward2009	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13876

What I see is brush and the absent of coniferous trees. What can be done with scrub land that has zero economical value, other than building expensive homes with million dollar views on it? The fact that it burned twice should make people aware, that clearing only lasts for a short time. Clearing underbrush to deny a fire of fuel, would have to be done every year, who has the money and time to deal with that, certainly not the state. Its obvious building homes in fire prone areas isn't a good idea. But don't let the side shows distract anyone from the major problem, "man made climate change."