Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Diogeron who wrote (3452)	1/29/1998 3:41:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

You're making Clinton look like a piker when it comes to parsing words. DI was addressing whether Cox could be labeled a partisan....are you saying that he wasn't?

To: Diogeron who wrote (3452)	1/29/1998 3:42:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20981

>>In an earlier post today, Duncan continued his seemingly unending string of factual inaccuracies by claiming that Archibald Cox was the campaign manager for JFK against Richard Nixon in 1960. Not that it matters that much, especially to Duncan, but the truth is that John Kennedy's campaign manager for the 1960 election campaign was his brother, Robert Kennedy. If Duncan wants to place a bet on this, I'll lay him 100-1 odds on it. Wrong and you lose. Loser. Everybody, Diogeron continued his seemingly unending string of factual inaccuracies by claiming that Duncan claimed that Archibald Cox was the campaign manager for JFK against Richard Nixon in 1960. Not that it matters that much, especially to Diogeron, but the truth is that Duncan said that Archibald Cox chaired Kennedy's campaign in the 1960 election. Big difference if words mean anything. exchange2000.com This latest assault turned back on the infidel, I'm reasonably sure that Cox was the Chair the campaign. He definitely was at the top. My point remains the same Cox was a partisan and far more so than Starr. Diogeron should start a thread headed "Errors and No Facts". He could fill it himself. I think I may post his messages over at Indiana University. If he is a professor, they should love it. Let's see if this sophomoric dolt apologizes. Regards