Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (164595)

11/1/2020 9:43:49 AM

From: arun gera

1 Recommendation

Recommended By
marcher

Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218519

of 164611

<From the graph it is clear that a lot of deaths were also compromised individuals with other health problems therefore the spike in lost life> You are missing other factors.. All it might be that it spread very rapidly in dense areas in the Northeast that were hit early. When that kind of intense spread occurs in smaller communities, the compromised individuals in those communities will also face hospitalization or death. The other reason of the spike could be that intially hospitals did not understand the right treatment, and had 4 times the number of deaths. So today's 600/day is actually equivalent to 2400/day in the initial stages. So the spike might not look as prominent if they had the right treatment from the start. -Arun