SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Winfastorlose who wrote (10718)12/15/2020 10:53:35 PM
From: robert b furman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26784
 
Sweet, I need it

Thanks amigo!

Bob



To: Winfastorlose who wrote (10718)12/25/2020 10:53:56 AM
From: Kirk ©1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Winfastorlose

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26784
 
Have you seen this potentially great news?

covid19criticalcare.com

Dr. Pierre Kory testifies to Senate Committee about Ivermectin, Dec. 8, 2020

Appearing as a witness on Dec. 8, 2020, before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs—which held a hearing on “Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution”— Dr. Pierre Kory, President of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), called for the government to swiftly review the already expansive and still rapidly emerging medical evidence on Ivermectin.

The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover. Dr. Kory testified that Ivermectin is effectively a “miracle drug” against COVID-19 and called upon the government’s medical authorities—the NIH, CDC, and FDA—to urgently review the latest data and then issue guidelines for physicians, nurse-practitioners, and physician assistants to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-19.



To: Winfastorlose who wrote (10718)12/26/2020 12:47:08 PM
From: Kirk ©1 Recommendation

Recommended By
robert b furman

  Respond to of 26784
 
Good article... my highlights

The University as the Woke Mission Field: A Dissident Women’s Studies Ph.D. Speaks Out
DECEMBER 22, 2020 SAMANTHA JONES
newdiscourses.com
  • I have a Ph.D. in Women’s Studies, but I’m not woke anymore. I write under a pseudonym because, if my colleagues were to find out about my criticisms of this field, I would be unable to find any employment in academia. That someone who critiques the axioms of a field of study feels compelled to write under an assumed name tells you everything you need to know about the authoritarianism underpinning this ideology.
  • I’m sad to say it, but I believe that Critical Social Justice ideology—if not beaten in the war of ideas—will destroy the liberal foundation of American society. By liberal I mean principles including, but not limited to, constitutional republican government, equality under the law, due process, a commitment to reason and science, individual liberty, and freedom—of speech, of the press, and of religion.
  • One of the most galling forms of hypocrisy I’ve experienced is that leftist professors claim a commitment to “social justice,” yet the academic departments they run employ large numbers of underpaid adjunct instructors [Kirk: dare we say "slaves"?] who are closed out of the high pay and job security of the tenured radicals.
  • Around this time, I became extremely disturbed when, while serving on a committee that gave writing awards, I was attacked by other committee members for judging on merit, for not taking into account skin color or gender.
  • I decided to seek out and try to understand other points of view, so I read books by authors to whom I had never been exposed, such as F.A. Hayek, Ronald Bork, Jonathan Haidt, Thomas Sowell, and others.
  • I realized that Critical Social Justice ideology is not only intellectually vacuous; it is downright dangerous, and that the reason it has captivated so many minds is not because of the strength of its ideas, but because it has succeeded in silencing more reasonable and time-tested principles.
  • However, people committed to liberal values have many significant disadvantages in this fight. They are generally older, having come of age at a time before Critical Social Justice ideology was dominant, and when strong liberal norms—specifically values of free speech and liberty—prevailed throughout society, whereas the majority of Millennials and Generation Z are heavily woke.
  • Liberals are committed to Enlightenment values of reasoned debate, pursuit of truth, the scientific method, fact-based analysis, and treating people as individuals, not as groups. In contrast, the woke view these Enlightenment values as a white supremacist project; wokeness advances primarily through underhanded tactics: histrionic open letters that accuse ideological opponents as traumatizing and even threatening the very existence of people of color, cancel culture, flash mobs, protests that sometimes devolve into riots, and so forth.
  • There is so little viewpoint diversity in academia that students don’t even realize that what they are being taught is an ideology, not factual analysis.
  • In the long term, it is going to be necessary to create more universities devoted to classical education, not indoctrination into Critical Social Justice ideology, as well as more K-12 private and charter schools in the classical tradition because university schools of education have been training “social justice” educators for decades now, so Critical Social Justice ideology is now in the K-12 public schools.
  • Lastly... Wokeness should continue to relentlessly mocked and parodied through meme culture (Andrew Doyle’s Titania McGrath is a great example). Just as important: Be courageous. Stand up for the beliefs that have made America a great country. If you hear people treating others as members of groups, articulate the importance of treating people as individuals. As Jordan Peterson put it, “The smallest minority is the individual.” If you encounter people treating others badly because of their gender or skin color, say that this behavior is morally wrong. If you see people attempting to “cancel” others, articulate why this is a terrible way to treat others. If you witness attacks on freedom of speech and advocacy of censorship, or if you meet people who are in favor of “hate speech” laws, or laws to combat “misinformation” (a code word for non-leftist ideas), articulate why freedom of speech is an absolutely essential and non-negotiable value. If you hear people discussing why they think socialism is great, take a stand for free markets and the prosperity they have produced. If you hear people calling for retributive justice and political violence, push against it and discuss why violence is never acceptable. If you encounter attacks on meritocracy, make a case for why merit is essential to the advancement of individuals and societies. I think a lot of liberals, like me, generally, if not naively, assumed that the liberal values underpinning America would simply continue throughout our lives, but these values are under attack and they need to be vigorously and unapologetically defended. Our civilization is at stake and the hour is late.



To: Winfastorlose who wrote (10718)1/10/2021 1:05:44 PM
From: Kirk ©1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Debt Free

  Respond to of 26784
 
Do people across the US wonder what it will be like under the new, single party rule?

We've been doing it for years!

Article from: The Mercury News - January 10, 2021

Democrats: Pandemic highlights failures

mercurynews-ca.newsmemory.com?publink=1c47e7a05_1345be2




To: Winfastorlose who wrote (10718)1/12/2021 8:33:07 PM
From: Kirk ©2 Recommendations

Recommended By
John Carragher
Winfastorlose

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26784
 
I can't imagine why so many people want all these "smart devices" in their homes.

The way I see it, each one crashes or fails to connect to the internet so often it wastes more time than it is worth. I didn't get washer and dryer with internet connection for this reason. Also, when they need an update that makes something you like not work any more or it fills with bloatware and you have to buy a new one just to get your functions again.... you're doubly screwed.

How soon until they turn to AI thought police and try to "change" you?




To: Winfastorlose who wrote (10718)2/7/2021 11:18:03 PM
From: Kirk ©1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Winfastorlose

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26784
 
It is good to see or about time that some in the media are now saying the homeless problem is progressive policies in SF.

There are some really telling facts presented in this...

Chaos by the Bay