Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (198580)	4/11/2021 4:22:14 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 363029

>> The fact is that the election was certified. Correct. As mentioned, a mere ministerial process. >> The result of a certified election is the default. Which makes it a fact. If it is known that an election is stolen, (let's say, it is conspicuous), does certification make it credible? Or righteous? Or immutable? (Three distinct questions).

To: Lane3 who wrote (198580)	4/11/2021 4:54:45 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 363029

I suppose his claim of it being "literally a fact" doesn't sway you?

To: Lane3 who wrote (198580)	4/12/2021 8:47:50 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 363029

>> The fact is that the election was certified. All the pieces were certified Right. A perfect example of government gone awry. As I have previously pointed out those certifications occurred absent dues process. Just CLAIMING there was due process doesn’t make it so. Reality is the Trump supporters were robbed, period. The evidence is substantial, perhaps overwhelming. But the courts were part of the problem. We’ve already discussed it repeatedly. I don’t have anything to add, unless you want to consider the post last night on the election theft in Detroit.