Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (4454)	2/3/1998 7:30:00 PM
From: Pat W.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

<<Should we believe her? Why?>> Should we believe Bill C.? Why?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (4454)	2/3/1998 8:18:00 PM
From: halfscot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

And let's consider this: given Clinton's reputation, she was a danger, coming on to him, telling people they were "fuck-buddies". ANYONE woulda wanted her outta there. But how to arrange it? Wouldn't have looked good for him to attack an "innocent young girl", claiming that she was telling lies about him, eh? Janice: This is exactly what I would do if I was innocent! Jeez Louise if we can be blackmailed by liars then we're all at jeopardy. halfscot

To: Janice Shell who wrote (4454)	2/3/1998 8:30:00 PM
From: alan w	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

"She said a lotta things on tape, apparently: that she kept the infamous navy whatever because it had Souvenir Stains, for example. Should we believe her? Why?" My question is should we believe him. She, first of all, has no track record that I know of (besides hearsay). He, however, has a past history of telling the people whatever sounds best at any one particular time. I know the answer to my question. I can't for the life of me figure out why you or anyone else would ever give him the benefit of the doubt. alan w